Radical Islam more about Arab nationalism than
religion, expert contends
Islamic terrorist groups, in particular al Qaeda, are driven more by
pan-Islamic nationalism than by religious fervor, a leading scholar asserts. In
formulating their response to the September 11 attacks, US officials have underestimated
the depth of nationalist sentiment in the Middle East, thus potentially increasing the
difficulty of containing the terrorist threat, the scholar adds.
Olivier Roy, a senior researcher at the French National Center for Scientific Research, told
EurasiaNet that the US attack against Iraq "deepens the extend of this [Arab
nationalist] backlash," underscored by reports that thousands of men from across the
Middle East and Central Asia have volunteered to go to Iraq and fight against US forces.
"It’s purely emotional right now," Roy said. Because most
Middle Eastern and Central Asian states feature closed political systems, in which
authoritarian leaders tend to stifle free expression, the main outlet for Arab nationalist
feelings is anti-Americanism, which widely viewed as virtually synonymous with
anti-imperialism. Roy stressed that Arab nationalism did not pose an immediate threat to
the US plans to oust Saddam Hussein, but could greatly complicate efforts to foster
regional stability over the medium and longer term.
In attacking Iraq, Roy suggested, the United States may be creating
more problems for itself than it is solving. "What will happen in five or six years,
it is difficult to know," he said.
"The United States can make good decisions for bad reasons, or bad
decisions for good reasons," Roy continued. "But there is a discrepancy in the
way Washington views the situation, and in what is the actual process at work. Sooner or
later, this discrepancy can lead to problems."
Roy examined recent trends at a round-table forum, titled Radical
Islam: A Middle East Phenomenon or a Consequence of the Globalization of Islam?, held
April 2 at the Open Society Institute in New York. Roy maintained that radical Islam is
effectively a misnomer, saying that radicals are instead utilizing religion as a cover for
essentially political acts.
"[Osama] bin Laden doesn’t care so much about religion,"
Roy said. In examining bin Laden’s statements, "if you replace ‘jihad’ with the
word ‘revolution’ you would have purely political speech. Looking at the content of
his speeches, they are modern, anti-imperialist discourses."
Roy compared contemporary Islamic radicals with leftist radical groups
of the 1970s, such as the Red Brigade in Italy and the Baader-Meinhof gang in Germany. He
asserted that political considerations fueled the September 11 attacks.
"The violence that we see now has little to do with Islam, it’s
nationalism," Roy said. "These guys are fighting American imperialism, they are
not fighting Christianity."
A significant number of al Qaeda members, especially non Saudis, are
"born-again" Muslims, defined as those who have recently embraced Islam, and
many of whom have lived the West and had lengthy exposure to Western culture. Mohammad
Atta, the reputed ringleader of the September 11 attacks, became a born-again Muslim while
living in Hamburg, Germany, Roy noted. Between one-third and a half of those in terrorist
networks are those who could be characterized as born-again Muslims, Roy estimated.
A vital, if currently underappreciated trend is that radical Islam is
developing in the West and is being exported to the Middle East and Central Asia. Roy
cited the Hizb-ut-Tahrir, which calls for the non-violent reestablishment of an Islamic
caliphate across the Middle East and Central Asia, as an example of the current trend.
Hizb is based in London, but its supporters are increasingly active in Central Asia,
working underground to undermine established authority in the region. [For
additional information see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"London is the Mecca of radical Islam," Roy said, adding that
those willing to engage in radical activity, including terrorism, "don’t convert
for Islam, they convert for political purposes."
EurasiaNet, April 3, 2003
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/recaps/articles/eav040303.shtml
|