The S.O.B. who came for tea
Jim Lobe
There was no 21-gun salute, no honor guard, no full-dress White House
press conference, no black-tie White House dinner, not even a real photo-op with President
George W. Bush.
Such was the welcome accorded Uzbekistan President Islam Karimov, who
opened his military bases to U.S. military aircraft and at least 1,000 U.S. Army Rangers
during the military campaign in Afghanistan and pledged even more support to President
George W. Bush's "war against terrorism."
Instead, Karimov got a 45-minute chat with Bush on Mar. 12 before being
politely and discreetly ushered to the door and sent on his way -- although not without a
tripling of U.S. economic aid, promises of millions of dollars more in military training
and equipment, millions of dollars in export credits, and a five-point Declaration on a
Strategic Partnership and Cooperation Framework which notes that Washington will
"regard with grave concern" external threats to Uzbekistan's security.
Karimov, who has ruled Uzbekistan with an iron fist since even before
the collapse of the Soviet Union, is perhaps the most embarrassing of Washington's new
allies in the fight against terror. "He's like the skunk at the garden party,"
said a State Department official who asked not to be identified.
Like Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza, of whom President Franklin
Delano Roosevelt once said, "He's an SOB (son of a bitch), but he's our SOB,"
Karimov has become Washington's SOB in Central Asia.
The leader for 12 years of Central Asia's most populous and powerful
state, Karimov has gained a reputation for ruthlessness. Having repressed his political
opposition -- most of whose leaders were imprisoned on trumped-up charges or forced into
exile, like Karimov 's most prominent foe, Muhammad Salih of the Erk (Freedom) Party -- he
has turned to clamping down on Muslims who choose not to practice their faith in
officially authorized mosques.
Some 7,000 Muslims are in prison, where they routinely face torture,
according to recent reports by Human Rights Watch (HRW), Amnesty International, and the
U.S. State Department. The regime even holds Stalin-style "hate rallies" at
which communities gather to publicly denounce religious "extremists" and their
families, according to HRW, which has an office in Tashkent. Police often detain family
members as hostages in order to compel suspected dissidents to surrender to the
authorities.
Such practices have spawned insurgencies against the regime. These
include the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), created in 1993. To escape the
repression, many of its younger militants fled to Afghanistan, where they gained the
protection of the Taliban movement and later forged links with Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda
network.
The IMU, which was blamed for setting off bombs in Tashkent in February
1999, carried out a series of cross-border attacks from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan in 1999
and 2000 but never represented an immediate threat to Karimov 's regime, according to
intelligence analysts.
Nonetheless, in what was seen as a transparent and successful effort to
gain access to Uzbekistan's military bases, Bush himself named the IMU as part of the
al-Qaeda network when he first addressed Congress about his plans to strike back at bin
Laden shortly after last September's terrorist attacks in the United States. This,
according to regional specialists, proved a major windfall for Tashkent.
"This last case of luck was so great that Mr. Karimov, being
singled out by the United States as an ally in the war against terrorism, began to feel
that he was the leader not only of Uzbekistan, but of all Central Asia," wrote Salih
in the New York Times earlier this week.
The combination of those regional ambitions and a terrible human rights
record makes Karimov Exhibit Number One for foreign-policy analysts who worry that
Washington may repeat Cold War-era mistakes by forging alliances of convenience with
governments whose policies may aggravate precisely the problems which it says it is trying
to combat.
"Propping up Uzbekistan as a regional hegemon not only would fail
to address but would actually exacerbate a key source of Central Asian instability: the
domestic political repression that fosters the radicalization of Islamist movements and
galvanizes popular support behind them," according to Pauline Jones Luong of Yale
University and Erika Weinthal of Tel Aviv University in Israel, co-authors of an article
in the latest edition of the influential magazine Foreign Affairs.
At the urging of U.S. diplomats, Karimov took some symbolic steps on
the eve of his trip here -- notably, officially registering a long-standing domestic human
rights group -- to show he is not insensitive to Washington's concerns.
But most regional experts dismissed the move as a token. They point to
Karimov 's failure to follow through on a pledge last summer to release 1,000 political
prisoners and his recent manoeuvre to add two more years to his term in office, to 2007.
Washington denounced the ploy but, by the following week, announced it was tripling aid to
$160 million for the year. Three weeks later, Karimov got his White House invitation.
"There is no reason to give away benefits like assistance or
summit without some strings attached," said Elizabeth Andersen, HRW's Europe and
Central Asia division director.
However, the strings that Washington has decided to attach are
connected in the first instance to the Pentagon, where Karimov was greeted yesterday by
Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and an honor cordon.
“Inter Press Service”, March 14, 2002 |