2000 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
KAZAKHSTAN
The Constitution of Kazakhstan concentrates power in the presidency.
President Nursultan Nazarbayev is the dominant political figure. The Constitution, adopted
in 1995 in a referendum marred by irregularities, permits the President to dominate the
legislature and judiciary, as well as regional and local governments; changes or
amendments to the Constitution are nearly impossible without the President's consent.
President Nazarbayev was elected to a new 7-year term in a 1999 election that fell far
short of international standards. Previous presidential elections originally scheduled for
1996 did not take place, as President Nazarbayev's term in office was extended in a
separate 1995 referendum, also marred by irregularities. Parliamentary elections held in
October 1999 were an improvement on the presidential election but still fell short of the
country's commitments as a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE).
A law passed in June would allow the President to maintain certain
policy prerogatives and a seat on the National Security Council after he leaves office.
The 1995 Constitution limited Parliament's powers more than previously, notably by
precluding it from appropriating state money or lowering taxes without executive branch
approval. However, Members of Parliament (M.P.'s) have the right to introduce legislation,
and some bills introduced by M.P.'s have become laws. The judiciary remained under the
control of the President and the executive branch. The lack of an independent judiciary
made it difficult to root out governmental corruption, which was pervasive, although some
corrupt officials were removed from office.
The Committee for National Security (the KNB, successor to the
Soviet-era Committee on State Security (KGB)) is responsible for national security,
intelligence, and counterintelligence. In practice it also plays a role in law
enforcement. It also oversees the external intelligence service, Barlau. The chairman of
the KNB reports directly to the Prime Minister and President. The Ministry of Internal
Affairs (MVD) supervises the criminal police, who are poorly paid and widely believed to
be corrupt. Both the KNB and the MVD police monitored government opponents, the opposition
press, human rights monitors, and some nongovernmental organizations (NGO's), who claimed
that KNB and MVD officials pressured them to limit activities objectionable to the
Government. The KNB continued efforts to improve its public image by focusing on fighting
government corruption, religious extremism, terrorism, illegal arms exports, and organized
crime. Members of the security forces committed human rights abuses.
The country is rich in natural resources, particularly petroleum and
minerals. The Government has made significant progress toward a market-based economy since
independence. It has successfully privatized small- and medium-sized firms and many
large-scale industrial complexes and has attracted significant foreign investment,
primarily to the energy and minerals sectors. The agricultural sector, which represents
about 10 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), has been slower to reform since the
Government has not established a legal basis for private land ownership. Official
statistics indicate that the long fall in real wages after independence stopped in 1997.
The average annual wage in 1999 was approximately $1,180 (167,560 tenge). The average
monthly nominal wage in 2000 was $95.14 (13,521 tenge). Real wages grew 5.3 percent in
2000 over 1999 figures. According to government data, in the first 3 quarters of the year
approximately 25.5 percent of the population had incomes below the "minimum
subsistence level" of $27 (3,969 tenge) per month, compared with 34.5 percent whose
incomes were below the 1999 minimum subsistence level of $24 (3,394 tenge) per month.
Rising oil prices in the second half of 1999 combined with the positive
effects of an April 1999 decision to allow the currency to float helped the country to
post GDP growth of 1.7 percent in 1999, after a 2.5 percent fall in GDP the previous year.
GDP per capita also increased slightly to $1066 (127,000 tenge). Inflation, which
initially spiked after the currency fell following the April 1999 decision to float the
currency, has been under control and was 9.8 percent in 2000. Real GDP grew by 9.5
percent.
The Government's human rights record remained poor; although there were
some improvements in a few areas, serious problems remain. The Government severely limits
citizens' right to change their government, and democratic institutions remain weak. The
OSCE concluded that presidential elections in January 1999 fell far short of international
standards, although it saw some improvement in the Parliamentary elections held later in
the year. The Government barred two opposition politicians from competing in the
presidential elections on administrative grounds and authorities harassed opposition
candidates during both election campaigns. During the year, government officials began a
series of conferences on electoral reform with opposition leaders and others under the
auspices of the OSCE, although the Central Elections Commission moved to effect electoral
commission changes before waiting for the conclusion of the conferences. The legal
structure, including the Constitution adopted in 1995, does not fully safeguard human
rights. Members of the security forces committed extrajudicial killings as a result of
abuse of military conscripts and, reportedly, through mistreatment of individuals in
custody. President Nazarbayev spoke out against police use of torture, and there were a
number of cases in which the Government pressed criminal charges against police accused of
mistreating individuals in their custody. However, human rights monitors criticized the
efforts as inadequate. Prison conditions remained harsh. The Government began a process of
transferring authority over prisons from the MVD to the Justice Ministry, a step that
human rights monitors had long sought, but he effect of this change could not be
determined as of year's end. The Government on some occasions used arbitrary arrest and
detention, and prolonged detention is a problem. The judiciary remains under the control
of the President and the executive branch, and corruption is deeply rooted. The Government
infringed on citizens' privacy rights.
The Government restricted freedom of speech and of the press. The
Government harassed much of the opposition media, and government efforts to restrain the
independent media continued. Vague laws concerning the media, state secrets, libel, and
national security increased pressure on the media to practice self-censorship. The
Government introduced draft amendments to the Law on Media in October that, if enacted,
would constitute a step backward for the independent media. However, the Government
continued to issue new licenses for various types of media and, according to the
Government, the number of media outlets increased. The Government continued to own some
major printing and distribution facilities and to enjoy influence over those owned
privately. Academic freedom is not respected. The Government imposes significant
restrictions on freedom of assembly. At least two organizers of unsanctioned
demonstrations were arrested and fined or imprisoned. The Government imposes significant
restrictions on freedom of association, and complicated and cumbersome registration
requirements hinder organizations and political parties. Some political parties increased
their organizational activities successfully. The Government sometimes harasses those whom
it regards as religious extremists. Domestic violence against women remained a serious
problem. There was discrimination against women, the disabled, and ethnic minorities. The
Government discriminated in favor of ethnic Kazakhs. The Government limited worker rights;
it tried to limit the influence of independent trade unions, both directly and through its
support for state-sponsored unions, and members of independent trade unions were harassed.
Workers continued to protest chronic nonpayment of wages. Child labor persists in
agricultural areas. There was evidence of trafficking in women and in at least one case
customs and border officials were under investigation for complicity in trafficking.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom
From:
a. Political and Other Extrajudicial Killing
There were no reports of politically motivated extrajudicial killings.
Members of the security forces committed extrajudicial killings as a
result of abuse of military conscripts and, reportedly, through mistreatment of
individuals in custody.
In July 28-year-old Kairat Sabdenov, the son of an M.P., died from
internal injuries that he sustained from a police beating in Kokshetau after he had been
detained following a car accident. In December police charged the policeman who allegedly
beat Sabdenov with murder. Five policemen were charged with improper performance of their
duties and one from the Akmola Oblast MVD was relieved of his post for investigating the
accident scene improperly.
Ivan Prokopenko died in a detention center in Aktobe on March 1. He had
been arrested 2 months earlier on suspicion of having stolen $250 (36,750 tenge) worth of
wooden poles. Human rights monitors reported that a doctor who examined the body and the
boy's parents saw evidence of brain trauma, burns, and cuts. The Aktobe city prosecutor
found in October that Prokopenko had died from head injuries suffered when he slipped and
fell, hitting his head on the concrete floor. The authorities indicated that their
investigation had found no other injuries and they closed the case.
In April a man named Bekov died in a hospital from injuries he had said
he sustained when police in Almaty detained and beat him. An official investigation was
launched, but no further information was available at year's end.
According to press reports, a criminal case was brought against a
police sergeant in Makhtaaralsk (Shymkent Oblast) for the 1999 beating death of a
24-year-old man, Nurzhan Saparov, who was in custody following his arrest for disturbing
the peace. At year's end, reportedly four police officers were awaiting trial charged with
responsibility for his death.
On December 1, a District court fined Lieutenant Colonel Zhanteleyev 2
month's wages in the 1998 death of Yalkynzhan Yakupov, whose body was found hanging in the
Chunjua District police station. However, the court dismissed the charges of abuse of
power and illegal detention against the Colonel. Zhanteleyev was amnestied under the
December 2000 general amnesty.
Reports indicate that deaths caused by military hazing persist. The
Deputy Chief of the General Staff reported 17 cases of death due to mistreatment in the
first 6 months of 1998. No statistics on the incidence of this form of mistreatment have
been available since that time. However, there are some reports that military personnel
engaging in hazing have been prosecuted, and the Government has begun a program to improve
training of military forces on social and legal issues. (See Section 1.c.)
Harsh prison conditions led to the deaths of some persons in custody,
many from disease (see Section 1.c.).
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment
The Constitution states that "no one must be subject to torture,
violence or other treatment and punishment that is cruel or humiliating to human
dignity;" however, police tortured, beat, and otherwise abused detainees, often in
order to obtain confessions. Government officials acknowledged the seriousness of the
problem and undertook some efforts to combat it. There were no reports of police beating
protestors as they have done in earlier years. In a speech to law enforcement officials on
April 19, President Nazarbayev criticized police use of an "arsenal of torture (that)
can surprise the most extreme sadists". President Nazarbayev referred in his speech
to cases where law enforcement officials seared one detainee with a hot iron and poured
cold water over another as he stood naked outside in cold weather. He said that the use of
such tactics was "widespread". Prosecutors brought criminal charges against 70
police officers for the unlawful use of violence against citizens during the year and
disciplinary actions were taken against hundreds more. More than 20 Interior Ministry
(MVD) employees reportedly were convicted on such charges. Human rights observers believe
that these cases cover only a small fraction of the incidents of police abuse of
detainees, which they characterized as routine. Training standards and pay for police are
very low, and individual law enforcement officials often are supervised poorly.
Some of the instances of mistreatment occur in prisons, and the
Government formally transferred authority over prisons from the Interior Ministry to the
Justice Ministry in a move intended to reduce such abuses. The actual transfer of
authority will be implemented over a period of 2 years. In March 2000, the MVD opened a
training center for penitentiary system employees in Pavlodar. Together with the OSCE and
Prison Reform International (PRI) the Government has undertaken training abroad for 15
instructors from this new institute to review penal policies, including human rights of
prisoners.
On April 26, three teenagers widely believed to have been tortured in
detention slit their throats in a Zhanatas courtroom after being sentenced to prison terms
for fighting with police. One of the 3, 17-year-old Kairat Seidakhmetov, died from the
self-inflicted injury. The Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights (KIBHR) and
independent television stations charged that police repeatedly tortured these 3 boys and
the 17 other individuals charged in the same case. One reportedly suffered a concussion
and two broken arms. Police reportedly cut the feet of another and stuck needles under the
fingertips of detainees under interrogation. One female detainee charged that police
repeatedly raped her. The detainees, some of whom confessed, reportedly had no access to
lawyers. Reports of the mistreatment led to demonstrations in Zhanatas in February and
again in April following Seidakhmetov's suicide. The July 4 edition of the official
Kazakhstanskaya Pravda newspaper reported that the Chief of the Legal Bureau of the
Presidential Administration visited Zhanatas to investigate the allegations of police
torture. The head of the city police force was fired and other MVD employees reprimanded,
but criminal charges brought against the policemen involved in the case were later
dropped.
Almaty authorities brought criminal charges against two policemen for
beating opposition activist Aleksei Martynov in custody in December 1999. A trial began in
August but had not been concluded at year's end. No arrests were made in connection with
the assault against opposition activist Andrei Grishin in November 1999, shortly after he
published a newspaper article critical of a new museum dedicated to President Nazarbayev.
Law enforcement authorities claimed that Grishin never filed a complaint. Grishin said he
filed a complaint with the Almaty city prosecutor's office in December 1999 and was
subsequently interviewed by an Interior Ministry official in January. The authorities took
no actions against police who allegedly beat 70 members of an Islamic group from Taraz
whom they detained in July 1999. The authorities took no actions against police accused of
beating a group of female hunger strikers in Aralsk in April 1999. Police closed
investigations, without making arrests, into 1998 assaults against opposition activist
Amirzhan Kosanov and a Kazakhstani employee of a foreign embassy. The latter assisted
diplomats in making contacts with opposition and human rights figures. Police detained a
suspect in connection with the 1998 assault against opposition activist Yelena Nikitenko
but did not bring charges, according to official sources, because Nikitenko, who moved
away from Kazakhstan, was unavailable to testify.
Six unidentified men assaulted Sergey Bondartsev, a youth organizer for
the opposition Republican People's Party (RPPK), in Almaty on April 9. Bondartsev suffered
serious internal injuries that required two operations. At the time of the assault,
Bondartsev was organizing a demonstration in support of opposition figure Madel Ismailov,
who had earlier in the week been sentenced to a jail term (see Section l.d.). The
demonstration did not take place. Law enforcement authorities made no arrests in the case,
claiming that Bondartsev had never filed a complaint. Bondartsev asserted that he filed a
complaint and that police from the Medeu district of Almaty interviewed him about the
assault while he was in the hospital. The attack clearly appeared to have been
premeditated.
MVD and other government officials participated in a September
conference in Almaty on combating police use of torture that was organized by the OSCE,
the KIBHR and the Government of Germany. They acknowledged that police use of torture and
other abuses were widespread.
Army personnel continued to subject conscripts to brutal hazing,
including beatings and verbal abuse. No statistics were available on the extent of the
problem. The Army launched a campaign to punish violators of a new antihazing policy in
1998, and the Government has taken action occasionally against officials charged with
abuses, often levying administrative sanctions such as fines for those found guilty. A
military court in Zhambul region sentenced a sergeant to death by firing squad in
December. The court ruled the man was guilty of killing two persons and of desertion to
avoid responsibility for beating up a soldier under him.
Prison conditions remained harsh and sometimes life-threatening due to
inadequate resources. In 1998, 1,290 inmates, more than 1 percent of all prisoners, died
from disease, mostly tuberculosis, aggravated by harsh and at times life-threatening
prison conditions and inadequate medical treatment (see Section l.c.). In 2000, 498
prisoners died in custody. More than 200 of these deaths were due to illness, mostly
tuberculosis. Another 170 gravely ill prisoners died shortly after release from prison.
Government officials indicate that improved treatment undertaken in cooperation with the
World Health Organization (WHO) has reduced the deaths from tuberculosis. In 1999, 384
prisoners died of the disease in custody and 409 were released on humanitarian grounds due
to illness and died at home (see Section 1.c.).
Overcrowding, inadequate prison diet, and a lack of medical supplies
and personnel contributed to the spread of tuberculosis and other major diseases.
Government officials reported that l0,000, or 12 percent of all, prisoners suffered from
tuberculosis. Government representatives assert that the incidence of tuberculosis is
declining, in part as a result of cooperation with WHO to improve conditions for both
prisoners and the civilian population. These figures do not differ significantly from
figures provided by human rights observers. The Government's senior prisons official
acknowledged that the number of prisoners with AIDS is growing. The number infected
reportedly grew from 256 in 1999 to 263 in 2000, although the authorities maintain that
the prisoners were infected before being incarcerated. Experts believe, however, that many
cases go unreported. Prison guards, who are poorly paid, steal food and medicines intended
for prisoners. Violent crime among prisoners is common. Prisoners protested poor living
conditions in prison through mass self-mutilation. According to the official press, 44
prisoners in Arkalyk reportedly cut open their abdomens on July 13. Some 57 prisoners in
an Almaty Juvenile Detention Center cut open their abdomens and wrists on August 11. None
of the prisoners died. The deputy head of the Arkalyk prison and the head and deputy head
of the Almaty juvenile facility were fired as a result of these incidents.
According to the Interior Ministry, during the year there were
approximately 80,000 prisoners in facilities designed to hold 60,000. A 1999 amnesty
reduced the total prison population by about 15,000, but the population nearly returned to
pre-amnesty levels within a year. The chief national prosecutor deplored overcrowded
conditions in an Astana detention center he visited in March, noting that cells of 200
square feet contained 20 detainees each. He reportedly ordered the release of several of
the detainees.
The Government followed up its 1999 general prison amnesty in December
with a law to provide amnesty in the first 6 months of 2001 for 18,200 inmates, shorten
the terms of an additional 2,500, and terminate approximately 3,000 pending criminal
cases. The 1999 amnesty resulted in the release of over 15,000 prisoners. Prisoners are
allowed one 4-hour visit every 3 months, but additional visits may be granted in emergency
situations. Some prisoners are eligible for 3-day visits with close relatives once every 6
months. Juveniles are kept in separate facilities.
Although there is no known statutory requirement, human rights monitors
and journalists wishing to visit prisons must receive authorization from the MVD. Although
the Government sometimes created obstacles for those who requested access to prisons, the
KIBHR reported that its representatives sometimes, but not always, received authorization.
The KIBHR visited men's, women's, and juveniles' prisons during the year. Prison experts
from the OSCE visited prisons in Akmola and East Kazakhstan oblasts. Two international
NGO's, the Dutch Interchurch Aid and Penal Reform International (PRI), accompanied KIBHR
on prison visits in Pavlodar during the year. PRI also visited prisons for juveniles and
women in Almaty. On September 6, the Minister of Justice announced that the Government had
decided to transfer responsibility for prisons from the Ministry of the Interior to the
Ministry of Justice. Human rights monitors had called for the change, which President
Nazarbayev endorsed in a September 1 address to Parliament.
d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile
The Government used minor infractions of the law frequently related to
unsanctioned assembly to arrest and detain government opponents (see also Section 2.b.).
On April 6, authorities in Almaty arrested, tried, and convicted labor movement leader
Madel Ismailov for organizing an unsanctioned demonstration and for contempt of court. The
Court sentenced Ismailov to 15 days in jail. Ismailov served a 1-year prison sentence in
1998-99 for publicly calling the President a "scoundrel". The demonstration in
question, a regular monthly pensioners' protest over living conditions, took place on
January 30. The contempt of court charge stemmed from Ismailov's refusal to answer a
summons to appear in court on April 5. Ismailov went to the courthouse on April 5 but
refused to enter when, he and press reports alleged, the authorities refused to allow his
lawyer or supporters to enter with him.
A court in Almaty on April 24 sentenced two members of the opposition
Republican People's Party of Kazakhstan (RPPK), Pyotr Afanasenko and Satzhan Ibrayev, to 3
years in prison for a weapons offense. An appeals court upheld the convictions. Afanasenko
and Ibrayev, former KNB officers, served as bodyguards to RPPK leader Akezhan Kazhegeldin.
Although it appeared there could be a factual basis for the charges against Afanasenko and
Ibrayev, the OSCE and international and domestic human rights observers charged that
government prosecution and sentencing of them was politically motivated. Some human rights
observers also criticized the authorities for incarcerating Afanasenko and Ibrayev in
ordinary prisons rather than in special institutions created to protect former members of
the security forces from possible retribution by other prisoners.
A member of the RPPK, film director Rashid Nugmanov, a long-time
resident of France, was detained by customs and tax officials upon arriving on an
international flight to Almaty on May 24 and summoned to appear before the tax police on
May 25. His brother, Murat, an Almaty businessman, was also summoned by tax authorities on
May 24. Details of the investigation were unclear. RPPK and human rights observers alleged
that the investigation of Rashid Nugmanov was motivated politically.
The chief of the Almaty branch of the RPPK, Alikhan Ramazanov, and an
activist of the party, Nurlan Bakirkhanov, were brought to trial in Medeu District Court
on June 7 for organizing an unsanctioned mass gathering on May 31. Both were fined $205
(29,000 tenge).
The law sanctions pretrial detention. According to the Constitution,
police may hold a detainee for 72 hours before bringing charges. The Criminal Code allows
continued detention for much longer periods with the approval of the General Prosecutor of
the Republic. Lower-ranking prosecutors may approve interim extensions of detention. In
practice police routinely hold detainees, with the sanction of a prosecutor, for weeks or
even months without bringing charges, and prolonged detention is a serious problem. The
General Prosecutor's office was reported in the official Russian-language newspaper
Kazakhstanskaya Pravda as stating that law enforcement authorities held more than 7,000
persons in custody longer than legally allowed in 1998. Government officials have
subsequently denied this, but no other statistics concerning the scale of this practice
have been made available. Additionally, short (3-hour) and long (72-hour) detentions for
"suspicion" are used widely.
A bail system exists, but government officials indicate that only 47
persons were released on bail in the first 8 months of the year (no figure for total
detainees was available, but 28 persons were released on bail out of the 26,598 persons
detained in the first 8 months of 1999).
According to the Constitution, every person detained, arrested, or
accused of committing a crime has the right to the assistance of a defense lawyer from the
moment of detention, arrest, or accusation. This right generally is respected in practice.
Human rights monitors allege that law enforcement officials have pressured prisoners to
use certain attorneys or to refuse the assistance of an attorney, sometimes resulting in a
delay before the accused sees a lawyer. Detainees also may appeal the legality of
detention or arrest to the prosecutor before trial, but in practice most persons refrain
from making an appeal due to fear of reprisal for doing so. If the defendant cannot afford
an attorney, the Constitution provides that the State must provide one free of charge.
Human rights organizations allege that many prisoners are unaware of this provision of the
law. The Government's reluctance to provide a lawyer is partly attributed to a shortage of
funds to pay court-appointed lawyers to which defendants are entitled. Some lawyers are
reluctant to defend clients unpopular with the Government.
Almaty authorities detained well-known criminal defense lawyer Anatoly
Ginzburg for 3 days in July after Ginzburg agreed to defend a man charged in a
high-profile murder case. Ginzburg remained under investigation for allegedly stealing
documents from the MVD in 1994, although no charges were filed. According to one press
report, Ginzburg had been warned by "the authorities" not to defend Anatoly
Adamov, the former deputy director of the national arms export agency, Kazspetsexport, in
connection with the April 15 murder of Kazspetsexport director Talgat Ibrayev. Ginzburg
and human rights monitors alleged that the authorities detained Ginzburg in order to
dissuade him from defending Adamov. In July the Union of Lawyers of Kazakhstan sent an
open letter to the heads of the national law enforcement agencies to protest the Ginzburg
case and a "universal" pattern of abuse of the rights of criminal defense
lawyers. The letter charged that law enforcement authorities infringe on the rights of
lawyers to meet confidentially, and as often as necessary, with defendants; deny lawyers
access to government buildings, including the courts; search the lawyers' belongings when
allowing them to enter; and surreptitiously record lawyers' conversations with clients. In
response to the letter, the Coordinating Council of the National Law Enforcement Agencies,
under the chairmanship of the Prosecutor General, passed a resolution in August calling on
the agencies to abide by the law and, where necessary, to draft new statutes guaranteeing
that lawyers can effectively do their work. However, a representative of the local
lawyer's association maintained that the Government had not passed any statutes
facilitating lawyers' work by year's end.
The Constitution prohibits forced exile, and the Government does not
use it.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
Government interference and pressure compromised the court system's
independence throughout the year--a situation based largely on legislative, administrative
and Constitutional arrangements that in practice subjugate the judiciary to the executive
branch of government. A presidential decree signed in September sought to lessen executive
branch control of the judiciary by moving responsibility for the courts' administrative
support from the justice ministry to the Supreme Court, though its ultimate impact
remained uncertain.
There are three levels in the court system: Local; oblast (provincial);
and the Supreme Court. According to the Constitution, the President proposes to the upper
house of Parliament (the Senate) nominees for the Supreme Court. (Nominees are recommended
by the Supreme Judicial Council, members of which include the chairperson of the
Constitutional Council, the chairperson of the Supreme Court, the Prosecutor General, the
Minister of Justice, Senators, judges, and other persons appointed by the President.) The
President appoints oblast judges (nominated by the Supreme Judicial Council) and local
level judges from a list presented by the Ministry of Justice. The list is based on
recommendations from the Qualification Collegium of Justice, an institution made up of
deputies from the lower house of Parliament (the Majilis), judges, public prosecutors,
legal experts, and Ministry of Justice officials. Under a change introduced in December,
the President appoints the collegium chairman.
According to legislation passed in December 1996, judges are appointed
for life, although in practice this means until mandatory retirement at age 65. Under a
1995 presidential decree on the courts and the status of judges, the President can remove
judges, except members of the Supreme Court or chairmen of judicial collegia, upon
recommendation of the Minister of Justice. (The Minister's recommendations must in turn be
based on findings by either the Supreme Judicial Council or Qualification Collegium of
Justice that the judge failed to, or was no longer capable of, performing his duties.) The
President can request, based on recommendations from the Supreme Judicial Council, that
the Senate remove members of the Supreme Court or chairmen of judicial collegia.
The 1995 Constitution abolished the Constitutional Court and
established a Constitutional Council. The Council rules on election and referendum
challenges, interprets the Constitution, and determines the constitutionality of laws
adopted by Parliament. The President directly appoints three of its seven members,
including the chairman, and has the right of veto over Council decisions. The Council can
overturn a presidential veto if at least two-thirds, or five, of its members vote to do
so. At least one presidential appointee must therefore vote to overturn the President's
veto in order for the Council to overrule the President. Citizens do not have the right to
appeal to the Council about the constitutionality of government actions, although they
were allowed to make such appeals to the former Constitutional Court. Under the
Constitution, only the President, chairperson of the Senate, chairperson of the Majilis,
Prime Minister, one-fifth of the members of Parliament or a court of law may appeal to the
Constitutional Council. The Constitution states that a court shall appeal to the Council
if it "finds that a law or other regulatory legal act subject to application
undermined the rights and liberties of an individual and a citizen."
Local courts try less serious crimes, such as petty theft and
vandalism. Oblast courts handle more serious crimes, such as murder, grand theft, and
organized criminal activities. The oblast courts also may handle cases in rural areas
where no local courts are organized. Judgments of the local courts may be appealed to the
oblast-level courts, while those of the oblast courts may be appealed to the Supreme
Court. There is also a military court.
The Constitution and the law establish the necessary procedures for a
fair trial. Trials are public, with the exception of instances in which an open hearing
could result in state secrets being divulged, or when the private life or personal family
concerns of a citizen must be protected.
According to the Constitution, defendants have the right to be present,
the right to counsel (at public expense if needed), and the right to be heard in court and
call witnesses for the defense. Defendants enjoy a presumption of innocence, are protected
from self-incrimination, and have the right to appeal a decision to a higher court. Legal
proceedings are to be conducted in the state language, Kazakh, although Russian also may
be used officially in the courts. Proceedings also may be held in the language of the
majority of the population in a particular area. In most cases, these rights are
respected. However, cases involving government opponents frequently are closed. Labor
movement leader Madel Ismailov alleged that the Medeu district court in Almaty refused to
allow the public to observe an administrative trial against him in April (see Section
l.d.).
The problem of corruption is evident at every stage and level of the
judicial process. Lawyers and human rights monitors alleged that judges, prosecutors or
other officials solicit bribes in exchange for favorable rulings in nearly all criminal
cases. Judges are poorly paid. According to the Minister of Interior, in 2000 the
Government dismissed 613 MVD officers and initiated criminal proceedings against 105 for
corruption related crimes. The Prosecutor General stated that 9 senior prosecutors, 8
district prosecutors and 3 department heads had been fired for similar offenses. The
Ministries of Justice and Internal Affairs have received additional funding to increase
salaries for law enforcement agents and judges. Human rights monitors allege that these
government actions only scratch the surface of the problem. According to press and other
accounts, judicial positions can be purchased.
There were no political prisoners. However, opposition and human rights
activists charged that the prosecution and imprisonment of Pyotr Afanasenko and Satzhan
Ibrayev was politically motivated (see section 1.d.).
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
Despite Constitutional protections, the Government infringed on these
rights. The Constitution provides that citizens have the right to "confidentiality of
personal deposits and savings, correspondence, telephone conversations, postal, telegraph
and other messages." However, limitation of this right is allowed "in cases and
according to procedures directly established by law." The KNB and Ministry of
Internal Affairs, with the concurrence of the general prosecutor's office, can and do
interfere with citizens' privacy and correspondence. The Criminal Procedure Code allows
the police and KNB to conduct searches or monitor telephone calls and mail without a
warrant if they inform the General Prosecutor's office within 24 hours of such activity.
Some government opponents complained that the Government monitored their movements and
telephone calls.
A central, state-run billing center for telecommunications services
opened during the year. Few companies complied with government requirements to route their
services through the center; those that did comply routed service only for the city of
Almaty through the center. The Government presented the creation of the center as an
attempt to ensure that all telecommunications traffic was being taxed properly. NGO's,
opposition figures, and human rights monitors expressed concern that the Government would
use the center to enhance its ability to monitor telecommunications and control the
availability of information on the Internet. Government officials denied that this was
their intent. As of year's end there was no effort to systematically block access to web
sites. However, clients of the two largest Internet providers, Kazakhtelecom and Nursat,
were blocked from direct access to the opposition Evrasia website from September 15 to
October 15. They still could access the site through proxy servers. Users of other
Internet services could access the site without difficulty.
A 1999 decree that would have required telecommunications companies to
conform their equipment to KNB standards was repealed on May 22. Human rights monitors and
many potentially affected companies had sharply criticized the decree.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The Constitution and a 1999 press and media law provide for freedom of
speech and of the press; however, the Government restricted these freedoms in practice.
The Government harassed independent and opposition media, and as a consequence many
journalists practiced self-censorship.
The media law reaffirms the Constitutional provision for free speech
and prohibits censorship; however, the Government takes advantage of the law's vague
language effectively to restrict media freedom. For example the law prohibits the mass
media from "undermining state security" or advocating "class, social, race,
national, or religious superiority" or "a cult of cruelty and violence."
Under the law, owners, editors, distributors, and journalists can be held responsible for
violations. The law also requires all media to register with the Government, but it does
not set forth an appeals process, other than through the courts, if registration is
denied. A vaguely written 1998 law on national security similarly restrains media freedom.
It gives the Prosecutor General the authority to suspend the activity of news media that
undermine national security. A 1999 state secrets law established a list of government
secrets the release of which is proscribed in the Criminal Code. Much of the information
on the expansive list was vaguely defined and thereby likely to inspire media
self-censorship. The law defines, for example, certain foreign policy information as
secret if "disclosure of this information might lead to diplomatic complications for
one of the parties". The list of state secrets enumerated in the law also included
all information about the health and private life of the President and his family. Also
defined as state secrets was basic economic information such as the volumes and scientific
characteristics of national mineral reserves and the amount of government debt owed to
foreign creditors.
In an April 19 speech to law enforcement officials, the President
called for the verification of mass media compliance with the media and national security
laws and how the media are financed. The President sharply criticized much of the national
mass media, including the Khabar state television channel, which is operated by his eldest
daughter. He accused Khabar of tendentious reporting; he accused other unnamed media
outlets of "inciting national strife, insulting the dignity of the people, coming out
against the Constitutional system (and) disparaging their country." Consistent with
public assurances on April 24 by the Minister of Culture, Information, and Social Accord
that the President's speech did not presage a crackdown on the media, government policy
toward the media did not appear to change after the President's speech. However, human
rights monitors charged that the tone of the President's speech reinforced a climate of
media self-censorship and law enforcement harassment of the media. Nonetheless, new
licenses for media of various forms continued to be issued and, according to the
Government, the number of media outlets in the country increased.
In October the Government introduced draft amendments to the media law
that would limit foreign media rebroadcasters to per cent of a station's total air time,
hold media outlets responsible for the accuracy of foreign media they rebroadcast, and
force websites to register as media outlets. Journalists and NGO's charged that the draft
law would infringe freedom of speech.
The Government continued to be in a strong position to influence most
printing and distribution facilities and to subsidize periodicals, including many that
supposedly were independent. Although publications expressing views independent of the
Government continued to publish, the Government took measures to punish publications that
reported certain undesirable stories and harassed two publications that were affiliated
with one of the opposition parties, measures taken with the evident intention of
intimidating certain media critics. These actions and the resulting widespread belief that
the Government was cracking down on independent media effectively resulted in widespread
media self-censorship. In January a court in Ust-Kamenogorsk ordered the local HBC-Press
newspaper to suspend publication for 3 months. The court found, and an appeals court
subsequently upheld, that the newspaper had violated the media law by publishing an
article calling for the overthrow of the country's constitutional system. The article in
question contained a public appeal from the leader of a Russian nationalist group arrested
in November 1999 for plotting to overthrow the local government in Ust-Kamenogorsk. The
newspaper had received a copy of the appeal at a news conference attended by other local
media. The editor of HBC-Press asserted that representatives of the KNB at the press
conference did not warn journalists not to publish the press release. HBC-Press went out
of business without resuming publication after the court-ordered suspension.
The key subject considered off limits by journalists was personal
criticism of the President and his family. Most newspapers did not present the story,
widely reported in the western press, about alleged American and Swiss investigations into
possible illicit payments by a foreign businessman to President Nazarbayev and two former
Prime Ministers. However, The Globe, a small-circulation Russian-English bilingual
newspaper based in Almaty, dedicated most of one edition to the subject. Law enforcement
authorities visited the newspaper's office on the day the issue appeared, July 6, to
summon its publisher for questioning. The visit appeared to be in response to the content
of the July 6 edition, although government officials characterized the visit as a routine
tax inspection. The Globe stopped printing for a month after refusing, its management
claimed, to agree to a request from its government-owned publishing house to refrain from
including such controversial material. About 1 month after resuming publication, the
newspaper announced that the publishing house would no longer print the newspaper
following inclusion of an article critical of the Prime Minster. However, the newspaper
continued to publish, and no charges were brought against the publisher, who remained
abroad.
The Government took steps that inhibited the publication and
distribution of newspapers affiliated with the opposition. The tax police temporarily
seized newspapers during investigations of various printing houses; they were later
returned. Government actions appeared to focus in particular on two newspapers associated
with RPPK, the party of former Prime Minister Akezhan Kazhegeldin, Twenty-First Century
(XXI VEK) and SolDat. Both newspapers had difficulty finding printing houses willing to
publish them, resulting in several missed editions. Twenty-First Century finally purchased
its own small printing machine but on December 27 unknown individuals allegedly broke into
their offices and short-circuited the machine. Customs officials seized a run of Soldat
newspaper when the editors tried to bring it across the border from Russia. These papers
were also later returned. SolDat also attempted to print in the Kyrgiz Republic twice
during the year, but both runs were confiscated by customs at the border. However, both
newspapers continued to appear during the year.
The KNB reportedly was investigating SolDat and its editor in chief,
Yermurat Bapi, in connection with a complaint that the newspaper insulted the honor and
dignity of the President, an offense proscribed in the Criminal Code. The complaint arose
from two articles in the newspaper's June 22 edition that reported corruption allegations
against the President. The articles were purportedly reprints from Western publications.
In June a government-run publishing house refused to continue printing
SolDat. The Ministry of Agriculture publishing house had been printing the newspaper for 8
months. The chief of the publishing house told journalists that he acted because the
newspaper's editors failed to meet unspecified contractual obligations. The management of
SolDat denied the charge. After SolDat subsequently began publishing in Russia, its
management claimed that customs officials at a border crossing point near Semipalatinsk
seized an entire print run of the newspaper on July 5. Editor in chief Bapi, who was
transporting the newspapers, said that customs officials justified the action because Bapi
misstated the number of newspaper bundles he was transporting. SolDat management publicly
charged that officials seized the newspaper because it contained articles critical of
President Nazarbayev on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Twenty-First Century continued
to have difficulty finding printing houses willing to publish it, though it managed to
circulate with inferior print quality. On April 27, the tax police in Almaty seized an
entire print run of the newspaper at a publishing house because of alleged tax violations
by the printer. Government authorities said that the seizure was directed at the printer,
not the newspaper.
The independent newspaper Nachnyem s' Ponedelnika, which specializes in
investigative articles about government corruption, continued to face a number of
defamation lawsuits, many from government officials. After finding in favor of a
defamation suit brought by the association of judges, a court in Almaty ordered the
seizure of the newspaper's assets, along with the personal assets of its founder and
executive director, on May 24. Police confiscated the newspaper's print run, financial
records, office equipment, and furniture, on the next day. In June a judge in Almaty fined
Nachnyem s' Ponedelnika $350,000 (50 million tenge) for infringing on the name of another
newspaper. The fine was reduced to $2,000 (290,000 tenge) by an appeals court in July.
Management of Nachnyem s' Ponedelnika alleged that these and other lawsuits against it
were politically motivated and that prosecutors, the tax police, and the mayor of Almaty
were harassing the newspaper. Government officials denied they were conducting a campaign
against the newspaper, and maintained that reckless allegations in the newspaper were
responsible for the spate of civil law suits against it.
Government's influence over media outlets is extensive. According to
government statistics, there were 1,258 mass media and information agencies in the country
as of September 1, 76 percent of them privately owned. However the Government runs the
newspapers that appear most frequently, five times a week, a number of privately owned
media are believed to be controlled by members of the President's family, and many of
those which are nominally independent, particularly Kazakh-language print media, receive
government subsidies. There are a number of newspapers that are produced by government
ministries, for example, Kazakhstan Science, which is published by the Ministry of
Science. Each major population center has at least one independent weekly newspaper. There
are 11 major independent newspapers in Almaty.
The Government controls nearly all broadcast transmission facilities.
There are 45 independent television and radio stations (17 television stations, 15 radio
stations, and 13 combined television and radio stations). Of these, 11 are in Almaty.
There are only two government-owned, combined radio and television companies; however,
they represent five channels and are the only stations that can broadcast nationwide.
Regional governments own several frequencies; however, independent broadcasters have
arranged with local administrations to use the majority of these. An organization of
electronic media, the Association of Independent Electronic Media of Central Asia
(ANESMI), exists, but it is divided and weak.
On March 31, the independent Almaty television channel 31 fired Tatiana
Deltsova, the chief editor of its nightly news program, under what the station president
publicly alleged was a government threat to close the station. The reported cause of
Deltsova's dismissal was an article that she presented March 30 about vandals' attacks
earlier that day on the homes of three leading Government opponents (see Section 2.b.).
Government officials reportedly had expressed their dissatisfaction previously with
Deltsova's coverage of the opposition. At year's end, Deltsova was hosting a new news
program on the television company TAN, an independent television station.
There were no reports, as there were in 1998, that the Government
threatened not to renew broadcast licenses of out-of-favor independent stations. There
were also no frequency auctions; many members of the independent media and human rights
monitors believed that the Government used the auctions in the past to harass and even
eliminate independent media.
During the campaign for the January 1999 presidential election, many
members of the independent media reported Government pressure not to cover opposition
candidates. Media coverage of the campaign for the October 1999 parliamentary elections
was extensive and featured all candidates. A nationally televised 2 hour live debate on
Khabar state television featured representatives of the nine registered parties that were
participating in the party-list section of the vote. Despite these improvements over the
presidential election, independent media around the country reported official pressure to
give the majority of their parliamentary election coverage to the propresidential Otan
party. They also reported that government authorities told them to limit coverage of, and
to focus on negative news about, the RPPK and Azamat opposition parties, as well as the
Orleu ("Progress") opposition movement. Some television editors claimed that
they were told categorically not to cover certain opposition candidates. An RPPK
candidate, Twenty-First Century newspaper editor Bigeldy Gabdullin, charged, correctly,
that his free broadcast was not shown in his home constituency of Talgar.
The Constitution provides for the protection of the dignity of the
President, and the law against insulting the President and other officials remained on the
books. The 1999 media law did not control, as did the earlier media law, advertising in
the mass media. One law restricts alcohol and tobacco advertising on television. The 1999
media law prohibited violence and all "pornography" from television broadcasts.
Academic freedom is circumscribed. As is the case for journalists,
academics cannot violate certain taboos, such as criticizing the President and his family.
During the presidential election campaign of 1999, there were widespread credible reports
that university and school administrators coerced faculty, students, and the parents of
schoolchildren to sign nominating petitions for the reelection campaign of President
Nazarbayev. Administrators reportedly pressured faculty to join the propresidential Otan
party formed later in 1999. According to credible reports, authorities in Karaganda
pressured the administration of the private Bolashak University to cancel a scheduled
April 11 lecture by a leading critic of the Government, political scientist Nurbulat
Masanov. An MVD officer was reportedly fired in April for allowing Masanov to deliver a
lecture at the MVD senior officers school. Masanov was unemployed since faculty at the
state Al-Farabi University in Almaty voted in 1998 not to renew his contract, allegedly
over his political views. Unknown vandals attacked Masanov's apartment, as well as those
of two other opposition activists, in March (see Section 2.b.). Course topics and content
generally are subject to approval by university administrations. There were reports that
university students in private as well as state universities sometimes had to pay bribes
for admission and good grades.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The Constitution provides for peaceful assembly; however, the
Government and the law impose significant restrictions. The 1998 law on national security
defined as a threat to national security "unsanctioned gatherings, public meetings,
marches, demonstrations, illegal picketing, and strikes" that upset social and
political stability.
Under the law, organizations must apply to the local authorities for a
permit to hold a demonstration or public meeting at least 10 days in advance, or the
activity is considered illegal. In some cases, local officials routinely issued necessary
permits. However, opposition and human rights monitors complained that complicated
procedures and the 10-day notification period made it difficult for all groups to organize
public meetings and demonstrations. They reported that local authorities, especially those
outside the largest city, Almaty, turned down most applications for demonstrations in
central locations. Officials in Almaty authorized a March 31 demonstration in the center
of the city by members of the opposition RPPK, although party members alleged that the
authorities were complicit in allowing students from Interior Ministry and olympic-games
training schools to disrupt the event.
In the early morning hours of the day preceding the demonstration,
unknown persons vandalized the Almaty apartments of RPPK activists Nurbulat Masanov and
Amirzhan Kosanov as well as of another well-known opposition figure, Seidakhmet Kuttykadam
of the Orleu movement. The vandals cemented or jammed shut the apartment doors, cut
electrical and telephone lines, painted threatening graffiti, and hurled a rock through a
window into a bedroom where Kosanov's infant daughter was asleep. The three activists
publicly charged that government agents working through the KNB were responsible for the
crimes. Government officials denied the charge and suggested that the victims might have
orchestrated the incidents to attract sympathy, a charge the activists denied. During the
week following the incident, Kosanov received a series of messages threatening him and his
family. Law enforcement investigations into the incidents were closed without arrests. On
March 31, the President of Almaty's independent Television-Radio Channel 31 acting under
what he said was government pressure, fired the station's news editor for including a
report about the vandalism incidents on the nightly news (see Section 2.a.).
There were numerous peaceful, unsanctioned demonstrations by workers
and pensioners protesting difficult economic conditions and the nonpayment of wages. For
the most part, law enforcement authorities did not interfere in the demonstrations or take
action against the individuals who participated; however, there were some exceptions. In
March a court in Astana sentenced a labor union leader to 24 hours in jail for organizing
an unsanctioned demonstration by striking construction workers (see Section 6.a.). The
authorities arrested well-known government opponent Madel Ismailov (see Section l.d.), who
took part in the longstanding monthly pensioners' demonstrations in Almaty; other
participants were not arrested. On April 20, the city court of Ust-Kamenogorsk suspended
the activities of the local chapter of the Pokoleniye pensioners' movement for 3 months,
charging that the group systematically carried out unsanctioned demonstrations. On
December 13, the Bostandyk district court of Almaty found Sakhib Zhanabayeva guilty of
organizing an unsanctioned mass gathering and sentenced her to 5 days in jail.
Zhanabayeva, an activist of the Kazakhstan Workers Movement, had taken part in a protest
by pensioners on November 30.
The chief of the Almaty branch of the RPPK, Alikhan Ramazanov, and an
activist of the party, Nurlan Bakirkhanov, were brought to trial in Medeu District Court
on June 7 for organizing an unsanctioned mass gathering on May 31. Both were fined $205
(29,000 tenge).
The RPPK claimed that it was denied access to hotels and other venues
in Almaty in May and June. Allegedly the Government had told hotels and other venues in
Almaty not to provide their premises for meetings of political parties or movements.
The Constitution provides for freedom of association; however, the
Government and the law impose significant restrictions on this right. Organizations that
conduct public activities, hold public meetings, participate in conferences, or have bank
accounts must be registered with the Government. "Membership organizations,"
such as churches or political parties, must register in each of the 14 provinces where
they have active members, whereas "nonmembership organizations," such as NGOs,
only register at the national level. Registration on the local level requires a minimum of
10 members and on the national level, a minimum of 10 members in at least 7 of the 14
oblasts. In addition a registration fee of $135 (19,845 tenge) is required, and most
organizations must hire lawyers or other consultants to expidite their registrations
through the bureaucracy. This increases the registration cost by approximately $200
(29,400 tenge). Some groups consider these costs to be a deterrent to registration.
The Constitution prohibits political parties established on a religious
basis. The Government has refused to register ethnically based political parties on the
grounds that their activities could spark ethnic violence; however, the small Kazakh
ethnic nationalist "Alash" Party was registered for the 1999 parliamentary
elections. The Constitution bans "public associations"--including political
parties--whose "goals or actions are directed at a violent change of the
Constitutional system, violation of the integrity of the republic, undermining of the
security of the state (and), fanning of social, racial, national, religious, class, and
tribal enmity." All of the major religious and ethnic groups have independently
functioning cultural centers.
To participate in elections, a political party must register with the
Government. The Government registered 3 new parties in addition to the 10 registered to
participate in the 1999 parliamentary elections. At least three parties registered in 1999
were widely viewed as opponents of President Nazarbayev. Under current law, a party must
submit a list of at least 3,000 members from a minimum of 9 oblasts. (The cities of Almaty
and Astana count as oblast-equivalents in addition to the 14 oblasts for this purpose.)
The list must provide personal information about members, including date and place of
birth, address, and place of employment. For many citizens, the submission of such
personal data to the Government is reminiscent of the tactics of the former Soviet KGB and
inhibits them from joining parties. Under the law, members of unregistered parties may run
for elected office as individuals but not as party members. The party affiliation of
candidates does not appear on ballots for candidates in single-mandate parliamentary
constituencies. Since the 1999 elections, 10 members of the lower house of Parliament
(Majilis) are elected on the basis of proportional, party-list voting. Two registered
opposition parties, Azamat and the RPPK, increased their organizational activities. They
participated in training seminars, were active in public political debates, and held press
conferences.
The Minister of Internal Affairs rescinded in October a directive that
MVD claimed gave law enforcement officers the right to attend any meetings of political
parties and NGO's. This claim, to which human rights monitors and opposition party leaders
had strongly objected, had been upheld by the Supreme Court in July. Authorities had first
asserted this claim when they brought charges against Bigeldy Gabdullin, a leading figure
in the opposition RPPK, for obstructing the work of a state organ. The charges arose from
a December 1999 incident in which Gabdullin insisted that a senior MVD officer leave a
meeting of RPPK officials at the RPPK office in Almaty. An Almaty court convicted
Gabdullin on January 25 and fined him $35 (5,000 tenge). The conviction was upheld on
appeal. The judge in the case said she based her decision on the presidential decree on
the organization and conduct of peaceful meetings, rallies, pickets, and demonstrations,
which authorizes law enforcement agents to attend certain public gatherings. However,
Gabdullin's lawyer stressed that article 11 of the decree explicitly exempts indoor
meetings of public associations, such as political parties, that are held in accordance
with law and the group's charter.
The Constitution prohibits foreign political parties and foreign trade
unions from operating. In addition the Constitution prohibits the financing of political
parties and trade unions by foreign legal entities and citizens, foreign states, and
international organizations.
c. Freedom of Religion
The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the various
denominations worship largely without government interference; however, the Government
sometimes harasses Islamic and Christian groups whose members it regards as religious
extremists. The Constitution defines the country as a "secular" state. The
constitution also requires foreign religious associations to carry out their activities,
including the appointment of the heads of religious associations, "in coordination
with appropriate state institutions." In general the Government does not interfere
with the appointment of religious leaders or other activities of foreign religious
associations, although foreign missionaries have encountered some visa problems.
Religious organizations, including churches, must register with the
Ministry of Justice in order to receive legal status. Without registration, religious
organizations cannot buy or rent real property, hire employees, obtain visas for foreign
missionaries, or engage in any other legal transactions. Although religious organizations,
unlike other nongovernmental organizations, are entitled by law to carry out their
activities without government registration, in practice many local officials insisted that
they register and in a few instances, disrupted services by unregistered groups.
Registration requires an application submitted by at least 10 persons and is usually a
quick and simple process. Some religious groups out of favor with the Government have
encountered difficulties registering in certain jurisdictions. These groups include
Jehovah's Witnesses and some Korean Protestant groups, as well as Muslim groups
independent of the Mufti (the national leader of Islam). Foreign missionaries require
state accreditation. Witnesses reported continued difficulties with registration in
Pavlodar, Osakarovka and Kzyl-Orda in 2000. One group of Jehovah's Witnesses in
Petropavlovsk has attempted to register five times. They received four rejections and
still have no answer to their latest, September 9, application. One human rights monitor
asserted that the Government typically claims that religious groups' charters do not meet
the requirements of the law. For example, Kazakhstani law does not allow religious groups
to engage in educating children without education ministry approval, and many religions
include education in their charters.
A 1999 law on education forbids the activities of educational
institutions, including religious schools, that have not been registered by the Ministry
of Education. Although no religious schools are known to be registered, the Government
apparently took no action against religious schools over registration pending full
implementation of the law. On December 19, First Deputy Minister of Education Erlan Aryn
sent a letter to all regional education departments rescinding an earlier ban on visits to
schools by religious figures, humanitarian and other aid from religious organizations, and
the rental of facilities to religious groups.
Government officials frequently expressed concerns about the potential
spread of religious extremism from Afghanistan and other states. Despite concerns about
regional security threats from groups claiming a religious basis, the Government did not
impose new legal restrictions on religious freedom. Draft restrictive amendments to the
law on religion, withdrawn by the government in March 1999, were not reintroduced.
However, the country's highest law enforcement officials called for toughening the
religion law. The Procurator General of the Republic and the Interior Minister both called
for prohibiting the activities of unregistered religious organizations. In February the
Interior Minister publicly expressed his dissatisfaction with the presence of conservative
Muslims in the country and criticized a local official for attending a stadium meeting of
Jehovah's Witnesses. The KNB has characterized the fight against "religious
extremism" as a top priority of the internal intelligence service. The official
Russian-language newspaper, Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, and the official television station,
Khabar, present as objective news allegations that unregistered religious groups present a
threat to national security and social cohesion.
The Ministry of Justice has requested that Jehovah's Witnesses amend
their charter to eliminate education as a religious activity. However there were no
reports that the Government shut down religious schools. Information on the number of such
schools, if any, operating in Kazakhstan, was not available.
In September an education ministry official announced that the Foreign
Ministry would "recall" all Kazakhstani students studying in religious
institutions outside Kazakhstan, a step considered by some observers to be aimed primarily
at preventing young Muslims from being radicalized by militant Islamic education abroad.
The official said that the measure was intended to protect the country against religious
extremism. It was unclear how the Government would implement the policy. The Government
announced that several students studying in Pakistan, Iran, and Turkey would return
voluntarily by year's end.
On June 26, the Third Congress of Muslims in Kazakhstan voted to
appoint Absattar Derbisaliyev as the new mufti (spiritual chief) of the national Muslim
organization. Senior government officials, including reportedly the Chief of the
Presidential Administration and the Minister of Culture, Information, and Public Accord,
took part in the Congress. Some Muslims alleged that the government officials engineered
Derbisaliyev's appointment and the resignation of his predecessor. Derbisaliyev publicly
denied that government officials present at the Congress influenced the votes of congress
participants, arguing that they were not there when the voting was conducted.
Some local officials continued to maintain, contrary to law, that
unregistered religious organizations could not conduct religious activities. Local KNB
officials disrupted meetings in private homes of unregistered groups of Jehovah's
Witnesses in Pavlodar, Osakarovka and Kyzl-Orda. In March the city prosecutor's office in
Astana, the national capital, issued a written warning to a group of schismatic Baptists
for not being registered. Earlier in the month, the head of the local Astana office of the
Ministry of Culture, Information, and Social Accord visited the leader of the schismatic
Baptists to recommend that the church alter its charter prohibition against seeking
government registration and apply for registration. In September a Baptist congregation in
Astrakhanka was ordered to close by the district court until it complied with registration
requirements. Earlier, the pastor had been fined $10 (1,500 tenge) for failing to register
the church. In September KNB official confiscated Bibles and other literature from a
prayer group in Kyzl-Orda and had not by year's end returned the documents despite the
Prosecutor's order to do so. Law enforcement authorities in Akmola Oblast, the province
that includes Astana, conducted regular inspections of religious organizations in order,
they asserted, to prevent the development of religious extremism and to ensure that
religious groups pay taxes.
Representatives of Jehovah's Witnesses alleged incidents of harassment
by a number of local governments. They claimed that city officials in Astana, Almaty, and
Shymkent sometimes blocked the group from renting stadiums or other large public or
private sites for religious meetings. In other cities, officials allowed the church to
rent facilities for such gatherings. Church representatives alleged in March that the
director of one facility in Almaty told them that city officials had given instructions
not to rent space to Jehovah's Witnesses. A city official denied the allegation. Church
representatives also alleged that the Prosecutor's Office in Kostenai requested
information from the church about its clergymen, organizational structure, and schools,
and that in April documents of Jehovah's Witnesses congregations in Taraz and Abay were
inspected. The church faced difficulties registering communities of church members in
Petropavlovsk, where registration has been denied several times, and Aktau, although it
ultimately was registered in Aktau. On June 7, local KNB and Interior Ministry officers,
accompanied by local government officials, raided a prayer house belonging to a registered
community of Jehovah's Witnesses in the village of Derbesek (South Kazakhstan Oblast). The
officers confiscated religious literature and church correspondence. Church
representatives complained to district and oblast KNB officials that the raid was illegal
because the officers did not have a prosecutor's warrant. In response the director of the
KNB department for South Kazakhstan Oblast wrote a letter confirming that no evidence of
"illegal missionary activity" was discovered and that the local KNB officers who
participated in the raid had been ordered to return the seized literature and
correspondence, which they did at the end of June.
On occasion the authorities took action against groups engaged in
proselytizing. In December, two female Jehovah's Witnesses were arrested and detained for
one day for proselytizing in Talgar. The police confiscated their documents but returned
them after three days. No charges were filed. On December 15, two Krishna Consciousness
devotees were detained in Aktobe for selling Krishna books on the street. Police
confiscated 20 books, but later released the women without charges. However, one Krishna
leader reported that in most oblasts officials leave their followers alone. In July in
Akshoki, near the Chinese border, members of a Baptist church reported that local KNB
officials, police and clergy incited a crowd to threaten a group preaching Christianity
and burn Christian literature. One member was severely beaten by a group of eight men who
demanded he convert to Islam. Government officials declined to comment on this incident.
Foreign missionary activity is authorized under law, but only when
missionaries are accredited by the State. In practice many missionaries operate without
accreditation. Although legally entitled to register religious organizations, foreign
missionaries generally find that to be registered they had to list a majority of local
citizens among the 10 founders of the religious organization. Some foreign missionaries,
whose presence is unwelcome to some Muslim and Orthodox citizens, have complained of
occasional harassment by junior government officials. In particular evangelical
Protestants working in schools, hospitals, and other social service institutions have
alleged government hostility toward their efforts to proselytize. Jehovah's Witnesses
reported difficulties obtaining visas for foreign missionaries to visit Kazakhstan. Other
missionaries are harassed by local officials regularly. On June 7, immigration officials
at Almaty airport refused to admit an American missionary. The missionary, who held a
valid visa, alleged that airport authorities did not give an explanation for his
exclusion, saying only that the reasons were secret. The missionary suggested that his
exclusion might have been related to problems that he had experienced 6 months earlier
with customs officials in Russia, where he had performed religious work. He subsequently
was denied a visa to return to Russia. Government officials subsequently confirmed the
refusal to grant entry to the missionary and indicated that his name matched one on an
immigration lookout list that had been circulated to members of the Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS).
Other foreign missionaries, unwelcome to some Muslim and Orthodox
citizens, have complained of occasional harassment by low-level government officials. In
particular evangelical Protestants working in schools, hospitals, and other social service
institutions have alleged government hostility toward their efforts to proselytize.
Kazakhstan's small Jewish population continued to revive. Following the foundation of the
Jewish Congress of Kazakhstan in December 1999, seven new synagogues opened during the
year.
The authorities took no actions against police who allegedly beat 70
members of an Islamic group from Taraz who were detained and ultimately released in 1999.
The Government invited the national leaders of the two largest religions, Islam and
Russian Orthodoxy, to participate jointly in state events. Leaders of other faiths
participated in some events, especially in Almaty. In December 1999, during a visit to the
United States, the President presented to the Lubavitcher community documents relating to
the father of the late Lubavitcher rabbi, Menachem Schneerson. Joint appearances by the
Islamic mufti and the Orthodox archbishop, often in the presence of the President, were
intended to promote religious and ethnic harmony. Some members of other faiths, including
Muslims not affiliated with the national Muslim organization headed by the mufti,
criticized the Government's inclusion of the mufti and archbishop in state events as
official favoritism and a violation of the Constitutional separation of church and state.
Many also believe that the distinction government officials sometimes make between
"traditional" and "nontraditional" religions violated the fundamental
standard of equality among religions.
d. Freedom of Movement within the Country, Foreign Travel, Emigration,
and Repatriation
The Constitution provides for the right to emigrate and the right of
repatriation; both are respected in practice. The Law on National Security prohibits
persons who had access to state secrets through their work from taking up permanent
residence abroad for 5 years after leaving government service. Citizens have the right to
change their citizenship, but are not permitted to hold dual citizenship.
According to the Constitution, everyone who is legally present in the
country has the right to move freely on its territory and freely choose a place of
residence except in cases stipulated by law. This provision formally abolished the
"propiska" system of residence permits, a holdover from the Soviet era, which
ended in 1991, and replaced it with a system of registration. However, in practice
citizens still are required to register in order to prove legal residence and obtain city
services. Registration in most of the country generally was routine, but it was difficult
to register in Almaty due to its relative affluence and local officials' fears of
overcrowding. The Government can refuse to register a citizen, just as it did under the
propiska system, in order to limit the number of persons who can move to a certain city or
area.
There were no further reports of government efforts to restrict the
movement of foreigners around the country. There were no further reports of foreigners
being detained for entering restricted areas that were not clearly marked. Likewise, there
were no further reports by foreigners that they were denied access or required to pay
exorbitant entry fees to ostensibly free national parks. There were no reports that the
authorities refused to approve the assignment of foreign aid workers to towns considered
"sensitive," as had been the case in earlier years. Internal visas are no longer
required for foreigners traveling outside Almaty.
An exit visa is required for citizens who wish to travel abroad.
Although refusals are rare in general, some opposition political figures encountered
difficulties obtaining exit visas. The deputy chairman of the RPPK, Gaziz Aldamzharov, did
not receive an exit visa for a trip he planned in February. He reported that immigration
authorities told him that the visa could not be issued because of an unspecified criminal
investigation against him. He ultimately received a visa after the dates of his intended
travel. There have been reports of some officials demanding bribes for exit visas. It is
usually necessary to meet a number of bureaucratic requirements before the exit visa is
issued. A permanent exit visa is much more difficult to obtain. It requires criminal
checks, documents from every creditor stating that the applicant has no outstanding debts
and letters from any close relatives with a claim to support from intending emigrants
giving their concurrence to the exit visa. In October the President and then-Minister of
Internal Affairs announced their intention to eliminate the exit visa requirement for
temporary visits or permanent residence abroad, but no action had been taken by year's
end.
Foreigners must have exit visas, although they receive them routinely
as part of their entry visa. Foreigners who overstay their original visas, or who did not
receive exit visas as part of their original visas, must get exit visas from the
immigration authorities before leaving. Foreign visitors are required to register,
depending on their circumstances, either with the immigration officials who admit them at
the airport or with the local office of visas and registration (OVIR). Many foreigners
complained that the process was bureaucratically cumbersome. Foreigners are no longer
required to register in every city they visit. One registration with OVIR is sufficient
for travel throughout the country. Immigration authorities occasionally refused to allow
foreigners without proof of registration to leave the country.
Authorities used the 1999 Law on State Secrets to justify confiscating
the passport of Amirzhan Kosanov, an official of the opposition RPPK, as he tried to fly
to the United Kingdom on November 25 (see Section 3). Kosanov, who had traveled abroad
during the 3 years between his departure from government service and full implementation
of the state secrets law, said that he had a valid exit visa and U.K. entry visa for the
November trip. Almaty migration police in October had tried to seize Kosanov's passport.
The Government alleged that Kosanov had access to state secrets when he served as press
secretary to former Prime Minister Akezhan Kazhegeldin, the leader of the RPPK; that
Kosanov had refused to sign a standard non-disclosure agreement and follow other simple
procedures prescribed by the law; and that other former officials with knowledge of
sensitive information had been allowed to travel after complying with the procedures. The
Government is not known to have used the Law on State Secrets to block the foreign travel
of any other former officials since the law's passage in 1999.
The Government accords special treatment to ethnic Kazakhs and their
families who fled during Stalin's era and wish to return. Kazakhs in this category are
entitled, in principle, to citizenship and many other privileges. Anyone else, including
ethnic Kazakhs who are not considered refugees from the Stalin era, such as the
descendants of Kazakhs who moved to Mongolia during the previous century, must apply for
permission to return. However, it is the stated policy of the Government to encourage and
assist all ethnic Kazakhs living outside the country to return, if they wish.
The Government usually cooperates with the U.N. High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR) and other humanitarian organizations in assisting refugees. In 1999 the
Government ratified the 1951 U.N. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its
1967 Protocol; however, the Government did not pass implementing legislation for the
Refugee Convention by year's end. The absence of implementing legislation left unclear
many aspects of the status of refugees, such as whether they have a right to work.
Following the passage of a 1997 migration law and the creation of the
Agency for Migration and Demography, the Government began in 1998 to register asylum
seekers and to determine their status in consultation with the UNHCR. The Government in
most cases allowed UNHCR access to detained foreigners. Ethnic Kazakh migrants are
automatically eligible for citizenship, although the Government has granted citizenship to
only about 10 percent of the 191,000 Kazakh migrants. Migrants from other CIS countries
are not considered to be refugees as they may travel and settle freely in any CIS country.
The Government has not allowed refugees without passports to register and has restricted
registration largely to refugees from Afghanistan. All non-CIS citizens are considered to
be intending immigrants. However, in practice the Government is tolerant in its treatment
of local refugee populations. Only the President can grant political asylum; he is known
to have done so only once since independence in 1991.
The Agency for Migration integrates the UNHCR and a local NGO,
Kazakhstan Refugee Legal Support, into the process of reviewing refugee claims. However,
the limited resources of the agency impeded the processing of many cases. Asylum claims
were processed only in Almaty, which is as far as 2,000 miles from other major Kazakhstani
cities. The Agency for Migration and the courts took a restrictive approach to many asylum
claims, apparently out of a desire to limit the number of refugees. The Government's
desire to control the size of the refugee population appeared to be motivated by the
country's difficult economic situation and national security concerns stemming from the
national origins of many asylum seekers. The UNHCR estimated that there were approximately
18,000 refugees in the country (at least 10,000 Chechens from Russia and about 5,000
persons from Tajikistan, 2,500 from Afghanistan, and 500 from other countries). There was
a large influx of Chechens fleeing the conflict with the central authorities in Russia.
Consistent with the Minsk Convention on Migration within the CIS, the Government did not
formally recognize the Chechens as refugees. However, the Government, in cooperation with
the UNHCR and Chechen organizations, did grant indefinite legal resident status to
Chechens until they could return home to safe conditions. By September the Government
registered 1,211 asylum seekers and accorded refugee status to about two-thirds of them.
The Government continues to give priority to the return of ethnic Kazakhs in order to
increase the percentage of Kazakhs in the overall population and to offset the large-scale
emigration of ethnic Russians and Germans. Since independence approximately 190,000 ethnic
Kazakhs, mostly from other CIS countries, Iran, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Turkey, China, and
Saudi Arabia have immigrated. The Government struggled to find resources for integration
programs for these immigrants, some of whom lived in squalid settings. The problem of
integrating the Kazakh migrants was compounded by the inability of about 90 percent of
them to obtain Kazakhstani citizenship, to which theoretically they are entitled by law.
Without citizenship, the migrants do not have clear rights to own property, open
businesses, or conduct other legal transactions.
Agreements between Kazakhstan and Russia that established broad legal
rights for the citizens of one country living on the territory of the other and provided
for expeditious naturalization for citizens of one country who moved to the other entered
into force in 1999.
Kazakhstan and China agreed in December 1999 not to tolerate the
presence of ethnic separatists from one country on the territory of the other. Human
rights monitors were concerned about the impact of this agreement on Uyghurs from China
present in Kazakhstan. The Government did not consider any asylum claims from Uyghurs; it
was unclear whether any Uyghurs applied. In general the Government was tolerant toward the
Chinese Uyghur population. There were no known cases of the Government returning Uyghurs
to China since February 1999, when the Government returned three Uyghurs. The Chinese
authorities had accused the three of murdering a policeman; Amnesty International reported
evidence that at least one was wanted for "separatist" activities. Some reports
indicate that the three men were subsequently executed upon return to China, but this
information has not been confirmed.
There were no reports that the Government forcibly repatriated refugees
in the period covered by this report to any country where they feared persecution.
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to Change
Their Government
The Constitution provides for a democratic government; however, in
practice the Government severely limited the right of citizens to change their government.
The Constitution concentrates power in the presidency, granting the President considerable
control over the legislature, judiciary, and local government. Modifying or amending the
Constitution is nearly impossible without the consent of the president. President
Nazarbayev was elected to a 7-year term in a 1999 election that fell far short of
international standards. He extended his previous term of office via a deeply flawed 1995
referendum without a contested presidential election (which, according to the Constitution
then in force, should have been held in 1996).
The President appoints and dismisses the Prime Minister and the
Cabinet. His appointment of the Prime Minister, but not of cabinet members, is subject to
parliamentary consent. He has the power to dismiss Parliament. If Parliament does not act
within 30 days on bills the President designates as urgent, the President can issue the
bills as decrees with the force of law. He appoints judges, senior court officials, and
all regional governors. He directly appointed the chairman and members of the Central
Elections Commission (CEC) who oversaw the most recent presidential and parliamentary
elections in 1999. In accordance with the Constitution, the lower house of Parliament
(Majilis) confirmed the CEC chairman and members nominated by the President in May.
President Nazarbayev won his current term in office in a 1999 election
held nearly 2 years earlier than previously scheduled. The previous October, the President
and the Parliament passed in 1 day, without any prior public notice, a series of 19
constitutional amendments that enabled them 1 day later to call the early presidential
election. Among other changes, the constitutional amendments extended the presidential
term of office from 5 to 7 years and removed the 65-year age limit on government service.
(President Nazarbayev would be 65 year of age before the end of his current 7-year
presidential term.) The Constitutional amendments also extended the terms of members of
Parliament from 4 to 5 years for the lower house (Majilis) and from 4 to 6 years for the
Senate. Government opponents and international observers criticized the short-notice call
of early elections because it did not leave enough time for the government to implement
promised electoral reforms and for intending candidates to organize effective campaigns.
The Government imposed onerous requirements on candidates seeking to
qualify for the presidential ballot. Candidates were required to submit petitions with
approximately 170,000 signatures collected in equal proportions from at least 11 of the
country's 16 regions (the 14 oblasts plus the cities of Almaty and Astana). They also were
required to pass a Kazakh-language test and to make a nonrefundable payment of 1,000 times
the minimum monthly wage (approximately $30,000), although an equal sum was then provided
to each registered candidate for campaign expenses. Although three candidates, in addition
to President Nazarbayev, qualified for the ballot, two of them, then-Senator Engels
Gabassov and then-Customs Committee chairman Gani Kasymov, were known as supporters of the
President and widely believed to be running at government behest.
In October 1998, less than 1 week after the early presidential election
was called, the Government resorted to a provision of the presidential decree on
elections, passed in May 1998, that prohibited persons convicted of administrative
offenses from running for public office within a year of their conviction. A district
court in Almaty summoned on less than 24 hours' notice 5 leading government
opponents--former Prime Minister Akezhan Kazhegeldin, former Social Democratic party
leader Dos Kushim, Pokoleniye Pensioners Movement leader Irina Savostina, Azamat movement
co-chairman Petr Svoik, and Tabigat ecological movement leader Mels Yeleusizov--to face
charges of participating in the October 1998 meeting of an unregistered organization
called For Fair Elections. The court convicted all five. Despite the judgment against him,
Kazhegeldin, the most widely known opposition figure, applied for registration as a
candidate in the presidential election. The presidentially appointed CEC disqualified his
candidacy under the provision of the presidential decree on elections that then served as
the election law. The Supreme Court upheld the disqualification. The CEC also used the
election law provision to disqualify the presidential candidacy of Amantai Asylbek, leader
of the Attan antinuclear testing movement, because of a 3-day jail sentence that he
received in February 1998 for participating in an unsanctioned demonstration.
The Government harassed President Nazarbayev's opponents throughout the
presidential election campaign. According to credible reports, government agents
repeatedly pressured managers of conference facilities to deny access at the last moment
to government opponents who had arranged to use the facilities for meetings and press
conferences. When opposition meetings and press conferences did take place, electricity at
the facilities often was interrupted. Government attempts to disrupt opposition meetings
appeared to have extended beyond national borders when the management of a Moscow hotel
withdrew permission at the last moment for a December 1998 opposition congress. Communist
Party leader Serykbolsyn Abdildin, the only candidate from the ranks of the preelection
opposition who qualified for the presidential ballot, publicly complained that local
officials loyal to the President impeded his attempts to hold campaign rallies and
meetings. As recently as November, authorities used the State Secrets Law to confiscate
the passport of RPNK official Amirzhan Kosanov as he tried to travel to the United Kingdom
(see Section 2.d.).
Assaults on two of Kazhegeldin's advisers appeared to have been
politically motivated and, government critics charged, sanctioned by the Government. In
addition, Kazhegeldin claimed that two gunshots were fired at him on the eve of the press
conference at which he announced his presidential candidacy. Unknown assailants beat one
of his public relations advisers, Yelena Nikitenko (see Section l.c.) and beat his press
spokesman, Amirzhan Kosanov. Several days before the attack, officials of the al-Farabi
National University in Almaty forced Nikitenko to resign from the faculty because of her
political activities. Government officials alleged that the Kazhegeldin campaign staged or
invented all three attacks. Following the announcement of Kazhegeldin's candidacy, the
then first deputy chairman of the KNB held an unprecedented press conference at which he
made admittedly unsubstantiated allegations of financial malfeasance against Kazhegeldin.
The tax authorities brought an action against Kazhegeldin during the campaign and,
according to credible reports, threatened actions against other government opponents. At a
news conference, Kazhegeldin supporters showed videotape of police repeatedly pulling over
Kazhegeldin's car for unspecified "inspections." Kazhegeldin also claimed that
border control officials at the Almaty airport tried to prevent him and his family from
taking a flight out of the country. An attack on a Kazakhstani employee of a foreign
embassy also appeared to be motivated politically and, human rights observers believe,
sanctioned by the Government. In December 1998, three men beat the employee outside his
apartment as the employee returned home. The employee suffered a cracked rib, some
internal injuries, and required stitches to close wounds near both eyes. The attackers
stole the employee's briefcase but did not try to steal his wallet and other valuables.
The absence of robbery as a motive and the fact that the employee's responsibilities
included assisting diplomats in making contacts with political opposition and human rights
figures suggested that the attack was motivated politically. Law enforcement authorities
closed the investigations into all of these cases without arrests. A suspect was
identified in the Nikitenko case but no charges were brought, allegedly because Nikitenko
had left the country and was unavailable to identify her assailant.
The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) of the
OSCE announced in December 1998 that it would not meet the Government's request to send a
presidential election observation mission. In its public explanation, the ODIHR cited
concerns about the exclusion of two opposition candidates, unequal access to the media,
and coerced support for President Nazarbayev. The ODIHR sent a small election assessment
team to report to the OSCE on the full election process. The assessment team concluded
that the presidential election fell "far short" of Kazakhstan's commitments as
an OSCE participating state. It cited in particular the exclusion of candidates, the short
duration of the election campaign, obstacles to free assembly and association, the use of
government resources to support President Nazarbayev's campaign, unequal access to the
media, and the flawed presidential decree that served as the election law.
A newly elected bicameral legislature took office in December 1999. The
lower house (Majilis), consisting of 77 members, was elected directly in October 1999.
Under amendments to the Constitution passed in 1998, membership in the Majilis elected in
1999 included 10 new seats assigned proportionally to political parties based on the
percentage of votes they received nationally (with a minimum vote threshold of 7 percent).
As before the other 67 seats were attributed by single mandate districts. The upper house
(the Senate) consists of 39 members 32 of whom are elected directly by members of oblast
and city parliaments; the President appoints the remaining 7 senators. (The number of
senate seats was reduced from 42 in accordance with the Government's 1997 decision to
reduce the number of oblasts from 19 to 14. Each oblast elects two senators, as do the
cities of Almaty and Astana.) Elections were held in September 1999 for 16 Senate seats.
The May 1999 election law requires candidates for both houses to meet minimum age and
education requirements and to pay a nonrefundable registration fee of 25 times the minimum
monthly wage (approximately $500--70,000 tenge). This fee represented a 75 percent
decrease over previous registration fees, which opposition figures, human rights monitors,
and the OSCE/ODIHR had considered a barrier to participation. The election law does not
require Majilis candidates to collect a certain number of signatures in order to be placed
on the ballot; however, Senate candidates must obtain signatures from 10 percent of the
members of the local assemblies in their oblasts in order to be placed on the ballot.
Political parties wishing to compete for the 10 proportionally allocated seats in the
Majilis must be registered by the CEC and regional electoral commissions in two-thirds of
the principal administrative jurisdictions (the 14 oblasts, plus the former and new
capital cities, Almaty and Astana). The Constitution states that participation in
elections is voluntary. One of the Constitutional amendments passed in October 1998
rescinded the requirement that at least 50 percent of eligible voters participate in order
to make an election valid. Experts had cited the old requirement as one of the causes of
fraud and vote inflation in past elections.
The legislature exercises little oversight over the executive branch,
although it has the Constitutional authority to remove government ministers and vote
no-confidence in the Government. The Constitution and other arrangements allow the
executive branch to dominate the legislature. Although Parliament must approve the overall
state budget, the Constitution precludes Parliament from increasing state spending or
decreasing state revenues without executive branch approval. The executive branch used
this authority to block legislation drafted by Members of Parliament. Nearly all laws
passed by Parliament originate in the executive branch. The executive branch controls the
budget for Parliament's operations; it has not provided funds for Members of Parliament to
hire staff, a situation generally viewed as decreasing Parliament's effectiveness. Should
Parliament fail to consider within 30 days a bill designated as "urgent" by the
President, the President may issue the bill by decree. Although the President has never
resorted to this authority, it gives him additional leverage with Parliament. While the
President has broad powers to dissolve Parliament, Parliament can remove the President
only for disability or high treason, and only with the consent of the Constitutional
Council, which largely is controlled by the President (see Section l.e.).
The introduction, for the 1999 parliamentary elections, of 10 new seats
in the Majilis distributed by party-list vote enhanced the role of political parties,
which, with the exception of the Communists, were previously very weak. The Communist
Party and three propresidential parties--Otan (Fatherland), the Civic Party, and the
Agrarian Party--divided the 10 new party-list seats in the 1999 parliamentary election. No
candidate nominated by a non-Communist opposition party won a seat in the Parliament. One
member of the opposition RPPK won a seat after running as an independent candidate. The
RPPK withdrew its party-list slate after two of its candidates, Akezhan Kazhegeldin and
Madel Ismailov, were declared ineligible. (They were the only two candidates rejected of
more than 600 applicants for Majilis contests.) Of the more than 600 other candidates,
about half who won ran as independents. Many of them were former government officials with
strong presumed sympathy for the progovernment parties.
Many activities of Parliament remained outside public view. In June
1999, Parliament banned the press and other outsiders from observing the vote of
confidence in the Government. Final totals in the parliamentary vote of confidence were
made public, but not the votes of individual members. The Parliament invited
nongovernmental representatives to observe at least four meetings. Many draft bills were
held closely and published in the press only after passage and signature by the President.
In 2000 the Parliament became more open by publishing important draft laws (for example,
the tax code) and by meeting with NGO's on others (for example, the local self-government
law).
Although an improvement in many ways over the most recent presidential
election, parliamentary elections held in 1999 were marred by election law deficiencies,
executive branch interference in the electoral process, and a lack of government openness
about vote tabulations. There was convincing evidence of government manipulatio |