Playing the identity card
Nearly 15 years after the break-up of the Soviet Union, Russia's
leaders are once more using patriotic ideas to try and forge a sense of national identity,
writes Tom Parfitt
President Vladimir Putin did not flinch at the expletives.
Russia's leader had invited Fedor Bondarchuk, director of this summer's
action blockbuster, Devyataya Rota (Company 9), to give a private showing of the film at
the presidential residence on the edge of Moscow.
When the film's heroes - a group of young men who bond together in 1989
during the dying days of the Soviet war on Afghanistan - began cursing, some aides in the
audience shuffled their feet.
But Mr Putin, the owner of a sharp tongue himself and a KGB veteran of
the "power structures", was untroubled. It was a "very good film" and
"a tragic story from the life of our country and our people", he said after the
screening on Monday.
The president is commander of the armed forces but his interest went
beyond idle military curiosity. Several events in the past week have shown that Russia is
once more in search of patriotic ideas to unite its splintered population.
Nearly 15 years since the break-up of the Soviet Union, it is tricky
game that must balance shame for much of the past with celebration of real achievements.
Things did not get off to a good start last Friday when the new
"people's unity day" public holiday was dominated by ugly nationalist marches in
the capital.
Political analyst Aleksei Makarkin believes the Kremlin is right to
seek a course of "moderate state patriotism".
"The problem with the holiday was that the authorities tried to
produce a propaganda of unity of Russia's different nations and religions," he said.
"But the ultra-right interpreted that as unity against enemies: Poles, Americans,
Caucasians, or whoever else."
Much like the marches, the erection on Tuesday of a monument to
"Iron" Felix Dzerzhinsky, former head of Stalin's secret police, the Cheka,
could be dismissed as a blip.
Dzerzhinksy was a ruthless Bolshevik whose revolutionary fervour meant
he saw no contradiction in founding children's homes while murdering thousands of the
Soviet regime's opponents.
While his reappearance outside Moscow's police headquarters is a
reminder of deep affection for some unpleasant figures, his popularity is nothing new.
More alarming this week was the showing on television of a repulsive
new campaign advertisement for the Rodina party, which is running for elections to the
city Duma next month.
The ad, which is being investigated by prosecutors on suspicion of
provoking inter-ethnic violence, features two of the party's leaders berating a group of
dark-haired men for dropping litter.
A slogan at the end of the ad hints the men - who are supposed to be
Caucasians such as Chechens or Ingush - are themselves the trash: "Let's clean our
city of rubbish!"
What is most troubling is the suspicion that the Kremlin deliberately
cultivates this kind of rabble-rousing rhetoric.
Although the party denies it, analysts believe Rodina was set up by Mr
Putin's allies to pinch votes from the communists. It scored good results in parliamentary
elections two years ago and its strident leader, Dmitry Rogozin, is a popular figure.
"Russia is perhaps the only example of a state where the genie of
radical nationalism is deliberately let out of the bottle," said commentator Andrey
Kolesnikov in an article on Wednesday, arguing that Rogozin was already "out of
hand".
At the same time, he argued, "it is probable that the genie, just
like 'democracy,' will prove to be 'manageable'."
In other words, the Kremlin can nourish the chauvinists as hate figures
while simultaneously using them to sideline legitimate parties that would threaten its
own, United Russia.
It may sound Machiavellian, but Russian politics often works that way.
And it's a dangerous operation when the end result is covert backing for politicians who
are eroding, not building, a positive form of patriotism.
Vyacheslav Kostikov, a former senior diplomat, entered the fray this
week, saying true pride in the nation would only spring from economic development.
"Instead of efforts to solve Russia's major problems - poverty and
theft - we are once again being treated to worn-out slogans," he fumed. "We're
being stuffed full of patriotic surrogates, to cover up the shortage of meat in the
people's soup."
A shorter route to national pride would puff the country's unique
legacy in science, literature and the arts.
Every democratic state must seek out a civic identity and shared past,
argues Irina Sergeeva, a political scientist and joint author of a new children's textbook
called Motherland Culture of the 20th Century.
But, she says, Russia places too much emphasis on military victories.
"Instead, we should be looking to the incredible humanitarian and intellectual
contribution Russia has made to the world, such as the writing of Tolstoy and
Dostoyevsky."
“The Guardian”, November 11, 2005
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
To discuss on a forum >> |