Former PM decries Russian nationalism
Mila S. Koumpilova
WASHINGTON, Jan. 27 (UPI) -- The Russian political landscape today
poses a grave threat to the country's democracy and, by default, to the region's
stability, warned former Russian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar at a speech hosted Tuesday by
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington.
Russia's promising economic growth has so far proved an ineffective
antidote to the revival of nationalist sentiment in the country, said Gaidar, a leader of
the liberal Union of Right Forces.
"I am very much afraid that we could see a radical nationalistic
wave with consequences difficult to predict," Gaidar said.
The speech titled "Russia's Economic and Political Situation
between the Parliamentary and Presidential Elections" focused on the crushing defeat
of the two Russian democratic parties in December's parliamentary elections and the
backlash against the oil giant Yukos as symptoms that democracy might not be faring well
in the country.
When Gaidar looked back on the failure of the two Russian liberal
parties, the Union of Right Forces and Yabloko, to make it into the Duma, he briefly
touched on his party's campaign mistakes and the forecasted regrouping of Russia's
democratic forces after the election blow. In contrast, he dwelled on a troubling
leitmotif in election campaigning.
"The most important and dangerous result was the competing of
parties over who will be most anti-Semitic, who will be blaming the non-Russians for
Russian problems, who will be most anti-American," Gaidar said.
According to him, this nationalist motif is clearly audible in Russian
public discourse in general, permeating pop culture as well as political pitches. Gaidar
said he is hearing more and more voices lament the decline of the Soviet empire and
blaming it on an American plot.
When an audience member brought up Gaidar's own prognosis of four years
ago that economic growth would bolster liberal sentiment, the former prime minister
admitted he stands corrected. Indeed, Gaidar said, support for the Communists has
consistently declined, but instead of switching over to the liberal forces, the electorate
is embracing the views of radical nationalists.
Reminding the audience that the rise of Nazi Germany was fueled by the
country's middle class, Gaidar said, "When revenues are good enough, when your needs
are met, why not sit in front of the TV and discuss how great the Soviet Union was and how
splendid it would be if we restored imperial might?"
Although Gaidar said he does not expect any significant short-term
jolts in the course of Russian politics and economy, he offered recent evidence that
political turmoil can hurt the country's economy. The 2003 standoff between the Russian
government and Yukos sent the wrong message to investors, Gaidar said.
In October, authorities froze part of the oil company's shares and
arrested its boss on fraud and tax evasion charges; a measure commentators suggested was
an act of political arm-twisting.
"We tried all the time to make Russia a predictable country,"
Gaidar said. "What happened with Yukos gives the sign that Russia is again
unpredictable."
Several members of the audience asked Gaidar what measures the United
States and the world community should undertake to halt the troubling upsurge of
nationalist sentiments in Russia. Gaidar said direct U.S. involvement in Russian politics
would be counterproductive but the United States should extend support to the pillars of
civil society, such as independent media and nongovernmental organizations, as a way of
indirectly boosting Russian democracy.
Gaidar, who said he has decided to step down from politics and engage
in research, also pointed out the beneficial effect of the country's integration into the
world economic community. "More people are traveling abroad and seeing the real world
and realizing that not everyone is the enemy of Russia."
“The Washington Times”, January 28, 2004
http://www.washtimes.com |